MONTH : APRIL 2022

NPS at Malpani Ventures

NPS in Venture Capital

Net Promoter Score (NPS) is used extensively across industries to measure customer loyalty and as a proxy for customer satisfaction. It has been adopted by some of the biggest companies in the world - from banks to airlines to SaaS companies.

NPS is a business tool that has become ubiquitous in mainstream customer relations. The idea is simple: to measure customer loyalty and satisfaction, you ask people how likely they would be to recommend a product/service to others on a scale of 0-10. You then segment the responses into three groups:

  • Detractors: Ratings of 0-6
  • Passives: Ratings of 7-8
  • Promoters: Ratings of 9-10

The NPS score is calculated by subtracting the percentage of Detractors from the percentage of Promoters (Passives are ignored). For example, if your survey results in 30% detractors, 50% passives, and 20% promoters, your NPS would be 20. 

According to Bain & Company, an NPS score above zero will result in growth in your business; a score above 50 means you’re doing very well. In our experience, most industries average between 20 and 50%.

While NPS for B2C companies is fairly common, it has only recently taken off in the B2B space. In fact, it’s recommended that Venture Capital Funds use NPS as a diligence criterion for investing in new startups. 

And yet, very few VCs use NPS themselves and seek feedback from their portfolio companies. One would think that when you're putting your money into someone else's company, you'd want to know what they think of you! How else would you know whether or not you are adding value to their company? And if you aren't adding value, wouldn't you want them to tell you so?

NPS can be an awesome way to understand the quality of the relationship between early-stage investors and founders. Also logically, investors that regularly ask their portfolio companies for feedback have more successful outcomes—and NPS is one way to make sure you're staying on top of that feedback loop. 

Learnings/ Insights from the NPS Survey at Malpani Ventures:

We conducted an NPS survey to seek feedback from our portfolio founders and the results were insightful. While the most common way to run the NPS survey seemed simply to ask: "How likely are you to recommend Malpani Ventures to fellow founders?" – We were not convinced. This question suffers from the fact while capital is now available more easily at the early stage, most founders are not in a position to say ‘no’ to early capital. 

At Malpani Ventures, we believe that it is important to measure the impact of our value add and responsiveness as investors to improve our performance. While at the same time, we did not want to make the survey an exhaustive exercise for our founders. Our objective was to run this as an anonymous survey so that we receive candid feedback. Seeking personalised qualitative feedback would 'out' the founders and limit their responses.

In the end, we settled for 10 questions that would not take more than 3-4 minutes to respond:  All questions (except one) to be answered simply by providing a rating between 0 (lowest/ not satisfied) and 10 (highest/ extremely satisfied)

Our overall NPS score was 46! In our view, this is a good score and not a great one! 

Key feedback we received on our survey centred around the following:

  • Improve peer to peer engagement in the portfolio
  • Connects with sector experts
  • Increase in-person meetings

We intend to incorporate the above in our plan for the next year and hit a target NPS of 50+ by next year! 

If you would like to know more about our NPS survey or are keen to work with us as investors, do write to me (Dhruv) or Siddharth

 

Ideal Customer Profiles

This post is for you if you are the founderCXO, or BD person in a B2B startup that leverages outbound sales as a part of its sales process.

This is a rather long one, so keep a cup of ☕, or bowl of 🍿by your side and prepare for your ride.


Building an outbound sales strategy can be difficult for businesses of any size, especially for early stage startups. One of the most difficult questions to answer is who you should be trying to sell to in the first place. If you get that wrong, everything else becomes even more difficult. Creating an ideal customer profile (ICP) is essential for outbound sales-led companies.


What do you mean by an ICP?

Put simply, an ICP is the representation of the type of business which will most likely want to buy your products or services, remain loyal to you, and become your customer advocate.

An ICP includes:

  • Company size (by revenues, or employees)

  • Industry

  • Need for your product/service

  • Information on individuals within the company

An ICP looks like a tool for your BD team to target. However, it is more than just a tool for your BD team. Product teams may also use an ICP to test whether they are incorporating the correct features and producing the proper add-ons. It is critical that all teams working on a certain product or service have a shared understanding of who the ideal customer is.


Why is an ICP required?

An ICP is an excellent tool to determine a prospect's strength. If a new lead is an exact fit for your ICP, you should probably put in a lot of effort to sell to them because it may lead to a higher conversion. Companies that do not fit this picture perfectly may still be worth selling to. But remember that the sales cycle may be longer, and the conversion rates will be lower. It will behoove your BD teams to not put in extra effort to chase these leads.

Consider a TravelTechCo, a startup selling price comparison software to enable best pricing for hotel rooms. For TravelTechCo, its ICP will most likely be a business hotel chain having more than 50 sites across a country, maybe even a global business hotel chain. A mom & pop Bed & Breakfast in a quaint town known for sightseeing will not be the ICP. TravelTechCo BD team will benefit and be able to close a higher value deal if they focus on the hotel chain than the B&B.

If you don't have a good ICP, you may end up putting too much effort into too many different areas of the market. Your BD team can squander time chasing down leads who will never buy. That wastes time, money, and effort. And as an early stage company, you do not have the liberty to do so.

The more you know about who will buy from you, the better.


How to identify an ICP?

There are some methods for identifying your ideal consumer. In a top down strategy, you ask CXOs to guide you to the correct SBU or team who can use the product. In a bottom up strategy, you gather advocacy in the lower level teams enough for them to reach out to upper management as advocates. At times, you may directly reach the ‘best possible’ decision maker as well.

What data points will you need to keep in mind?

  • Type of company (single person, family business, organization, multi-national)

  • Which companies are ideal for you? (Product, service, hybrid businesses)

  • What solutions do they currently use? How much do they pay? Why do they use that particular solution?

  • Decision makers at the company? Organization structure

Continuing the above example, for TravelTechCo, the ICP will include business hotel chains with more than 25 properties which currently use OTAs as a price signal tool, and the decision maker will most likely be the upper management.

Top down strategy

As the name suggests, you start your reachout at the top. Via LinkedIn, or the company website, you find the contact details of a VP, CXO or Head of Department, and email them to refer you to a relevant person within the organization. Our portfolio company Clodura.ai enables this seamlessly. Ideally you may need to share a teaser to get higher ups excited about your product, but trying to sell to them is not recommended. When this person refers you to their juniors, its the boss literally telling them to give you some time → this tactic works well.

Bottom up strategy

This is a bit difficult to do in enterprise sales, but a very good sell. You want to reach out to people lower in the company and get their attention. If many people in the lower levels pitch for your product, it makes the upper level give a proper look. Most sales products like CRM, Lead Gen etc. get a buy in from the team using it before the upper management approves the purchase.

Decision maker strategy

For large deals, at times it is essential to reach out to the decision maker. This saves time and avoids dilution of your pitch when it passes through multiple stakeholders. You need to know who the decision maker is, and reach out to them directly. Warm intros make your life easier.

Whom to reach out to?

Depending on the size and complexity of an organization, the decision makers will be distinctly different.

For small orgs, early stage startups with 0-10 employees

The decision maker is usually the founder or a CXO level employee. CEO for a business related product, CFO for a finance/payroll product, CTO for tech, and CMO for marketing.

For orgs that are scaling with 10-50 employees

These orgs have VP or vertical heads in the above mentioned areas like business, marketing, finance, tech etc.

For growth stage orgs with 50-500 employees

Department specialists in business, marketing, finance, tech etc.

For scaled up orgs with 500+ employees

Regional SBUs or heads

The best companies usually have a three-pronged approach to run all strategies simultaneously or periodically.


How to write an ICP?

This is a key question which can be answered by answering the below questions:

a) Who are your ideal customers?

b) Why are they your ideal customers?

Let’s dive deeper.

Who are your ideal customers?

Your ideal customers will have all or a combination of the follow characteristics:

a) Intent- They are ready to buy your product

b) Ability- They are able to pay and buy your product

c) Willingness- They are willing to pay to buy your product

d) Competence- They have the competence to use and be successful with your product

e) Scale- They are scaling their business which opens opportunities for repeat selling, cross selling and up selling

f) Connects- They can connect you with other relevant buyers by becoming advocates

If you are an early stage company

You may not have lot of data, your best bet is to use guesstimates

If you are a growing company

You can look at past data, understand trends, and identify characteristics of what makes your ideal customer.

Metrics to identify ICP

  • Customers with the lowest acquisition cost

  • Customers with the shortest sale cycle

  • Customers with most repeat sales

  • Customers with highest satisfaction or rating

  • Customers with highest referrals

  • Customers with lowest service or delivery cost

  • Customers with longest engagement

There is no right answer to these questions or metrics. But with enough data points, you will be able to identify trends and characteristics of your company’s ICP.

Why are they your ideal customers?

Once you’ve identified who are you ideal customers, its time to understand why are they your ideal customers. The easiest way is to ask them. You can read more about how to conduct productive user interviews.

Good customers are always willing and happy to talk to you. Best thing is to set up a few short virtual meetings with a pre set agenda shared in advance and start the process. The agenda should be to understand user feedback, and improve service quality.

A sales rep or customer success person are the best people to conduct these interviews. These can be phone or video calls, and in case they are pressed for time, beautiful questionnaires created on Tally.so or Typeform may just do the trick.

Once you combine answers from both of the above, you will find your ideal customer profile.


What next?

Use it as a prospecting tool or checklist, and keep measuring outcomes against your ICP since there may be changes to the profile along the way.

Use it to sell. After the ICP is fully developed, you will have a clear idea of who your ideal customer is, why are they your ideal customer, what are their pain points, what value can you add, and what are their goals.


Additional reads

  1. What is an Ideal Customer Profile: definition and template questions

  2. Ideal Customer Profiles and Buyer Personas—How Are They Different?

  3. The Framework for Ideal Customer Profile Development

  4. How to create your ideal customer profile for B2B lead generation

  5. Worksheet: How to Define an Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) for Account-Based Marketing

How to get more from investors

How to get more from investors:

Most investors are willing to help good entrepreneurs in any way they can. The problem is that there is often a disconnect between what founders think investors should be doing for them, and vice versa as well! This means that if founders don't ask for help, then the investor isn't going to offer it... until the next fundraising round anyway!

All founders want to get more from investors, but most founders don’t receive the optimal output from their investor

Here are some of our thoughts:

Ask and you shall receive

  • Investors & founders are aligned: Investors know that the best way to get more out of an investment is to assist the founders and their companies to become successful!
  • Further, in the case of abundant capital, investors today are looking at ways to prove their ‘founder-friendliness’ to attract other ideas/ founders! Any assistance by an investor which provides them some form of validation will always be forthcoming!
  • Other than the potential financial upside, investing in startups at the early stage is usually fun: It’s creative, challenging, and constantly changing. Most early-stage investors/ angels invest to have a direct connection to innovation – Smart founders know how to tap this

Consistent updates which keep the investors engaged in your story:

  • Founders often tend to forget that investors view their investment as an unfolding story. It is imperative for founders to share their updates in a manner that keeps the investors hooked on their narrative. Founders underestimate how easy it is for investors to lose interest in a company
  • An update that follows a consistent format with metrics tracked over a period of time and broad short-term strategic targets is a good way to ensure that investors understand your perspective. A desirable format may look like
    • Highlights / Lowlights
    • Performance / KPIs
    • Strategic goal 1 for the next quarter
    • Strategic topic 2 for the next quarter
    • Investor Asks

Prepare a common update but personalise asks.

  • Investors assess what entrepreneurs are good at, and they know what founders are uncomfortable with. It’s often a value-add if you can get an investor to help you get better at something you’re not good at — that’s how many entrepreneurs work. If you tap into that, it’s a huge win-win situation.
  • Similarly, founders should assess how best to get the most from each investor. Ask for help with specific tasks- customer introductions, product feedback, hiring talent for a specific role, etc.
  • Set investor meetings with an agenda and share information in advance, this allows investors the time to collect their thoughts. Also, remind investors of previously unfulfilled asks! – If an investor can question your unfulfilled targets, so must you!

Existing investors are the best soundboards for planning a new round

  • While preparing for the next round, understand from existing investors what attracted them to you in the first place. Some investors undertake their research and develop their own calculations of the TAM and potential path the company may take to grow. Leverage this and build your next deck. You are entitled to ask for an investor memo!
  • Understand frankly which investors will back you in the next round:
    • A clear signal of low confidence is investors putting forth their cash only once you have onboarded a new investor – This is a major risk. Understand their apprehensions and address them in your pitch as these are likely to pop into the thought process of incoming investors as well
    • An underrated way for founders to get honest feedback from their investors is to ask this question: ‘Will you independently back me with more capital today?’ The answer to this question will usually shine a light on all things the founders must prepare for before their next fundraise

Why we passed an opportunity to invest in the mock interview prep space

At Malpani Ventures, HR Tech and Ed Tech are key areas of interest, and at the intersection of both lies the college-to-jobs space of Mock Interview Prep.
 
 
COMPANY
We recently evaluated a company in the mock-interview space. The company offers affordable & customizable mock-interviews for final year students preparing for job interviews/placements. The USP being feedback from mock interviews to help them prepare better.
 
The first part of the interview assessment have been automated today, while the second part relies on an industry evaluator who provides feedback few hours after the interview.
 
 
GTM
Strategy is to approach colleges to acquire students. This is done because:
a) Colleges want better placement rates
b) Corporates want better quality and trained freshers
c) Students want to be trained to get better salaries
 
The company is aiming for mass market, and affordable (Rs 1000/ticket) while many companies are aiming to go towards Rs 3000+/ticket size. While this company may have a wider market at low ticket sizes, other companies may have a narrow market with high ticket size thereby making the size of the opportunity somewhat similar.
 
Most companies follow the GTM of being the preferred interviewing platform for corporates -> Reach scale -> Open platform as a mock tool for candidates by claiming they were able to place 100s of candidates at Aspirational companies -> command a premium.
 
 
MARKET SIZING
Considering the company is targeting final year engineering students, we arrive at the following:
Engineering branches Number of students in lacs
Computer Science Engineering 9.4
Mechanical Engineering 6.8
Electronics Engineering 6.1
Civil Engineering 4.8
Electrical Engineering 3.7
TOTAL 30.9
Final year students (assumption) 7.7
Source: Statista  
 
Considering the above, we assume the following cases:
a) Bear case: Every student avails 1 mock interview
b) Base case: Every student avails 3 mock interviews to interview at Engineering, IT, BFSI jobs
c) Bull case: Every student avails 5 mock interviews to interview at different streams, and different companies, and company enjoys better pricing
 
Market sizing Bear case Base case Bull case
No of tickets purchased by a student 1 3 5
Ticket size (Rs) 1000 1000 1250
Market size (Rs cr)                    77                  232                  483
To simplify, if all goes well for the industry, the total business generated in the industry can be between 100-500 cr per year under different scenarios. 
 
However, we understand that not every engineering graduate takes up a job immediately. Many go for MS or MBA abroad, or do MBA in India, or study for civil services exams. This means the market size will be on the lower side.
 
If we believe the company can take 10% of the market, then the annual revenues for the company can be between 10-50 cr which is not a very attractive number for growth investments.
 
This changes if the company repositions itself as a tool for companies to evaluate candidates which can widen its market multi-fold. But as we see this is not the focus area for the company.
 
 
HYPOTHESIS
Here is our 3-point hypothesis on this industry
 
a) Job seeker adoption
A business model in this space needs demand validation. Demand can be validated if more and more students use these tools for mock interviews. If there are 67 lac freshers (from all streams, source) looking for jobs in India every year -> we should see a higher % of students using tools like these to prepare for interviews.
 
b) Recruiter adoption
There is no need for a mock interview without a corresponding real-life interview. If there is demand, students are using these tools to conduct mock interviews and acing them, then we should see curiosity and need from recruiters to use these tools as an interviewing platform to acquire talent. We should see any one of the top 5 IT/BFSI companies (tend to hire the most talent, has most attrition) in India integrating these tools in their fresher talent recruitment tech stack in the next 12 months and exclusively hire freshers via these tool-led interviews. This will validate the need.
 
c) Automation of the entire product
Validating demand and need may bring in revenues. But many companies are gross margin negative due to the manual aspect of technical evaluation, which means we may not see value creation at scale. We will need to see automation, using ML to build AI to provide detailed feedback to users so the product is scalable and profitable.
 
 
COMPETITION
There are a bunch of startups operating in the space like:
  • PrePlaced
  • Pramp
  • InterviewBuddy
  • Interviewing.io
  • Exponent
  • Monjin
  • GeeksForGeeks
  • InterviewBit and more
There is a lot of money flowing into the space where the market today can be accessed by probably the top 10% of job seekers. There is no validation of the hypothesis that candidates will keep using the same platform as they climb up the corporate ladder as different career roles and positions require different levels of assessment, tools, and interviews as these products are early in their life cycle. We do not see the same job platforms being used by candidates at different points in their career [eg Naukri (entry level) vs LinkedIn (mass market white collar) vs eFinancialCareers/iimjobs (CXO, Buy side, hedge funds)], and we see something similar in this space as well.
 
 
VIEWS
  • Need: We believe the need for mock interview tools exists. It not only makes for better prepared candidates, but also reduces the time & effort required by corporates in the hiring process leading to win-win outcomes
  • Market size: We do not believe it is a large market. With potentially ~8 lac engg graduates a year, the market for fresher-oriented interview-prep market is between 100-500 cr
  • Competition: With multiple startups in the space, we believe the industry will soon be in land grab mode and winner will be the one that outspends others
  • Model: We are unsure if a completely automated evaluation platform will excite students because they want feedback from real-life industry persons
  • GTM: We believe that startups that cater to corporates will have an edge vs ones that cater to students because the interview process, needs, and outcomes are determined by the corporates. The ones entrenched inside the recruitment tech stack of a corporate will have a natural demand from students who want to conduct mock interviews on the preferred platform of the corporate they want to work with
 
WHERE WE CAN GO TERRIBLY WRONG
  • Market size: We can go wildly wrong on market sizing if we only focus on engineering freshers. If we expand it to all freshers in India, the market grows by almost 10x. Numbers become crazy when we add lateral job changes. But the positioning of a fresher vs experienced job portals are different [eg Naukri (entry level) vs LinkedIn (mass market white collar) vs eFinancialCareers/iimjobs (CXO, Buy side, hedge funds)]
All grad branches Grads/year in cr    
Male grads 0.31    
Female grads 0.355    
TOTAL in cr 0.67    
Source: Statista      
Market sizing Bear case Base case Bull case
No of tickets purchased by a student 1 3 5
Ticket size (Rs) 1000 1000 1250
Market size (Rs cr)              665        1,995        4,156
  • Changing model: If the model changes from interview prep to providing a steady flow of ready candidates to corporates, acting as a transacting recruitment agency. Having said that, every company in this space has the end goal of becoming a vetted jobs marketplace which brings us to the outspend to land grab argument
 
FINAL VIEWS
There is a need for such products, but we believe that the market is small, and value creation seems limited for a player. We will continue to monitor our thesis in the space.

Post

Recent Posts