
You just got a term sheet. First reaction: pure excitement. Second reaction - about thirty minutes later - complete confusion.
What is a 1x non-participatory liquidation preference? What does CCPS mean? Why does a "non-binding" document have 38 sections and feel like it needs a law degree to understand?
Most first-time founders sign term sheets without fully understanding what they've agreed to. Years later when there's an acquisition on the table, or a new investor coming in, or a co-founder wants to leave the clauses they didn't read carefully come back to haunt them.
This video, and this post, exist to change that.
We've walked through every major clause in a real startup term sheet - the kind we use at Malpani Ventures using plain English and real numbers. You can download both the template and the explainer through the link in description of the video.
Before diving into clauses, here's the frame. Every term sheet no matter how complex is really deciding four things:
Keep these four questions in mind as you read any term sheet. Every clause connects back to one of them.
Founders and investors often talk past each other on valuation because they're using different numbers.
Example: Pre-money of ₹40 Cr + ₹10 Cr investment = ₹50 Cr post-money. Investor owns 20%.
Always clarify which number is being quoted in any negotiation conversation.
Liquidation preference determines who gets paid and how much when the company is sold, merged, or shut down. Think of it as a queue: investors with liquidation preference get paid before founders see anything.
The most founder-friendly structure. The investor chooses the higher of:
They pick one. They cannot take both.
₹30 Cr exit example (₹10 Cr invested, 20% stake):
In a strong exit, say ₹100 Cr - the investor converts and takes ₹20 Cr (20%), leaving ₹80 Cr for founders. The preference only protects the investor's downside in weak exits.
With 2x preference on the same ₹30 Cr exit:
That's half of what founders would get under 1x. Always push back on anything above 1x.
Non-participating: investor takes preference OR equity. One choice.
Participating: investor takes preference AND THEN participates in remaining proceeds as an equity holder.
₹100 Cr exit, 1x participating:
₹100 Cr exit, 1x non-participating:
Participating can cost founders ₹8 crores in this example. Across multiple rounds and investors, it compounds dramatically.
Anti-dilution kicks in when a future round happens at a lower valuation than yours - a down round. It protects investors from value erosion by adjusting their conversion price.
Two types:
Full Ratchet - the investor's entire stake gets repriced to the new low price. If they owned 10% at ₹40/share and the new round prices at ₹20/share, their effective ownership jumps to 20%. Founders bear all the pain. Rare in India and a serious red flag if asked for.
Broad-Based Weighted Average - the adjustment is proportional, accounting for both the new price and the number of new shares issued. Much fairer to founders. This is the market standard. This is what you want.
Every VC-backed company needs an ESOP pool. But when you create it changes the math significantly.
Pre-money ESOP (watch out): Pool is created before the investor's stake is calculated. A 10% ESOP pool means founders go from 90% → 80% before the investor even enters. Investor stays at 20%. Founders absorb all the dilution.
Post-money ESOP (better): Pool is created after investor's stake is set. Both founders and investor dilute proportionally.
Most investors in India push for pre-money ESOP creation. Know what you're agreeing to before you sign.
If founders do a secondary sale of their shares, investors can require the buyer to also purchase their pro-rata shares on identical terms. Fair, standard, don't push back on it.
Before selling shares to an outside buyer, you must first offer them to existing investors at the same price. Investor has 30 days to match or pass. Protects investors from unknown parties entering the cap table.
Before the investor can sell their shares to anyone, they must first offer them to founders. You bid without knowing what the market would pay. ROFR is generally more favorable to the holder because you see a reference price first; ROFO requires bidding blind.
This surprises most first-time founders. Your shares are subject to reverse vesting meaning if you leave early, unvested shares can be bought back at face value.
Standard schedule:
If a co-founder who holds 40% leaves at month 18:
Understand this schedule, and make sure the "good leaver / bad leaver" provisions are defined clearly in the Definitive Agreements.
As long as the investor holds a minimum stake (typically 3-5%), they'll have approval rights over a list of decisions. Common items include:
In a healthy relationship, these are typically signed off quickly. The concern is when things go wrong each item on this list can become a blocking mechanism. Review it carefully from a worst-case perspective.
Non-compete: You cannot start or join a competing business. Negotiate the scope narrowly - "similar business" should be defined precisely in the Definitive Agreements.
Non-solicit: You cannot poach employees, customers, or suppliers for a competing venture during and after your employment.
Exclusivity: Once you sign the term sheet, you cannot approach any other investor for 45 days. This is legally binding even though the rest of the term sheet is not.
And one more thing people miss: the term sheet typically expires in 72 hours if not signed. Don't let that urgency push you into signing before you've understood every clause.
If you take nothing else from this post, take these:
Before You Sign - Do These Four Things
We're making both documents available for free:
Have questions about a specific clause in your term sheet? Drop them in the comments below or reach out to us at startupmentors.in.
This post is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a qualified startup lawyer before signing any investment document.